that
the delays, several months in some cases, were not his company's fault
but were "due to confusion and lack of definite instructions between
the two Navy Bureaus and the [Navy's] inspecting engineers at our
mills," compounded by the Robert Dollar Line's unexplained delays in
shipping the steel on schedule.
The Navy responded quite defensively to the Kiangnan-U.S. Steel
exchange, citing its lack of contractual obligations in matters between
the two, noting that Kiagnan was "responsible for the contractual
performance of its subcontractor," and blaming U.S. Steel for delivery
delays; "it does not appear that any functionary of the Navy Department
can be considered in any way responsible for delays" - although the
Navy already had chastised the officer responsible for timely delivery
of this steel.
Construction of the gunboats in Shanghai fell behind schedule
immediately, not because of any design, shipping, and quality problems,
but also because of many design, shipping, and quality control
problems, but also because of the Chinese Revolution's impact on
Kiangnan, as Chiang K'ai-shek's Kuomintang forces swept northward from
Canton.
The situation in Shanghai was so disturbed by March 1927 that Commander
Border asked Mare Island Navy to halt shipment of gunboat material.
Border concluded in his 1 April progress report for hull number 43 that
launching and delivery dates were "indefinite" for all six gunboats:
the progress
during [March] has been such as will further delay the
completion of the vessel, due to stoppage of work on 21 March, due to
disturbed conditions in Shanghai... At present, prospects of early full
resumption of work are not favorable ... the arrival and taking over of
the Works by Shantung forces on the 15th, with the result that all
Chinese draftsmen, clerks, and weight clerks quit, and the taking over
of the work, by Cantonese [i.e., Kuomintang] forces on the 2lst,
resulting in stoppage of practically all work for the remainder of the
month.
|
Commander
L.S. Border, Superintending Constructor of the Yangtze Patrol gunboats
in Shanghai, described the USS Panay (PG-45) as "strong and well built,
and well performed." A fouled launching on 10 November 1927, however,
was seen by some as a bad omen; Japanese aircraft sank her "by mistake"
in December 1937.
He
also had to deal with equipage and personnel issues as construction
progressed. Exchanges with the bureaus detailed crew size and changes
to the allowance list, which dictated the type and number of almost
everything that went on board the new ships, including soap dishes for
the crew's heads, toasters in the flag mess, and a brass bed for the
admiral's cabin.
The original contract had required gunboat deliverv by Kiangnan to the
Navy at monthly intervals beginning with "PG 43" on 1 March 1927; hull
number 48 was due on 1 September 1927. Because of the various delays,
however, the Asiatic Fleet commander told Washington in early May that
Border intended to Launch the first two gunboats (numbers 43 and 44) on
21 and 28 May 1927, respectively. These normally festive events would
take place with little ceremony in view of "the present state of
conditions in this country."
The gunboats were named officially on 10 May 1927: Guam (PG-43),
Tutuilla (PG-44) Panay (PG-45), Oahu (PG-46), Luzon (PG-47), and
Mindanao (PG-48) all Pacific Islands. Construction delays resulting
from material delays, labor unrest, design changes, and Kiangnan's
inexperience resulted in the ships being delivered to the Navy from
10.7 months (Guam) to 15.4 months (Tutuilla) late.
|
As
the ships were
completed, they underwent builder's trials by Kiangnan and then
acceptance trials by the Navy's Board of Inspection and Survey (INSURV
Board). The Asiatic Fleet commander cited these trial results as
evidence that Kiangnan's work had been "very well and reasonably done."
Border's comments on builder's trials were upbeat: "performed well"
(Guam), "highly satisfactory" (Tutuilla), "strong and well
built, and
well performed" (Panay), "Very satisfactory" (Oahu), "very satisfactory
on all trials ... strong and well-built" (Luzon), and "very
satisfactory" (Mindanao).
Acceptance trials were more objective and more demanding; the
congressionally mandated INSURV Board
was
(and still is) notoriously independent and hard to please. Its reports
generally were good and recommended all boats for commissioning, with
few discrepancies: "panting bulkhead," "suspected structural weakness
in stern overhang," "unsatisfactory woodwork finishing."
The
ships' launchings were uneventful, except the Panay: on 10 November
1927, the first attempt failed when "after traveling slowly for 30 feet
she stopped and was blocked up." The ways were then removed, freshly
greased, and replaced. An inferior quality of tallow caused the
difficulty. A fouled launching is considered an ill omen and some "old
China hands" may not have been surprised when Japanese aircraft sank
the ship "by mistake" ten years later.
The fleet commander authorized monthy payments for each gunboat during
construction. Kiangnan had performed well enough to receive regular
payments, with only small amounts withheld occasionally for
unsatisfactory progress; a typical monthly payment to Kiangnan was
$21,000 (gold) per ship. Kiangnan's satistactory work was supported
further in the INSURV Board's reports and more tangibly by the
fleet commander's expeditious authorization of final payment to settle
the construction contract. The new ships were well built: when
the Guam was fired on by "bandits" in 1929, her bulletproof steel
plating prevented crew injuries; periodic INSURV Board
|